Dialysis Safety Series Clinical Safety Resources
Dialysis is not safe. Accidents will happen unexpectedly.
The nurse is the last line of defense. These pages are your preparation.
Vigilance — Critical Thinking — Rapid Action
Case Study: Dialysate Potassium Error – Dialysis Safety
Back to Safety Series Home
Critical Incident Case Study

Dialysate Potassium Error

When the Machine Said "PASS" — But the Patient Almost Died
Incident Date: 2024 Dialysis Unit — Isolated Treatment Room 2 Patients Affected Severity: Critical

The Machine Displayed "PASS" — While Delivering a Lethal Dose of Potassium

Expected Dialysate Potassium: 2.0 mmol/L  |  Actual Delivered: 14.0 mmol/L
Standard conductivity monitoring could not detect this error because decreased sodium offset the increased potassium — maintaining normal total conductivity while delivering a fatal concentration.

Event Timeline 14:00 – 15:20

14:00
🆘 Shift Start — CPR in Progress
Upon arrival to the dialysis unit, ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was observed for a patient in an isolated treatment room. The cause was not immediately apparent to staff.
14:10
⚠️ Second Patient — Same Machine
A second patient was placed on the same hemodialysis machine in the isolated room. Within minutes, the patient exhibited acute irritability and restlessness — symptoms not consistent with the patient's baseline condition.
14:12
🛑 Immediate Intervention
Dialysis was terminated immediately for the second patient. The patient was transferred to the main treatment area and connected to a different machine with a documented history of stable operation. Blood sampling for electrolytes was initiated.
14:30
✅ Patient Stabilization
After transfer to the alternate machine, the second patient's symptoms resolved completely. This differential response indicated the issue was related to the isolated room's equipment or supplies — not the patient's underlying condition.
15:00
🧪 Laboratory Confirmation
Laboratory analysis was performed on the original machine:
Patient blood potassium: Elevated
Dialysate potassium: 14 mmol/L (Normal: 2 mmol/L)
15:10
🔍 Source Identification
Investigation revealed a new batch of acid concentrate had been placed in the isolated room that morning. The batch number differed from the concentrate in use in the main treatment area. All containers with the new batch number were quarantined immediately.
15:20
📋 Corrective Action
The supplier was notified. All patients who could have been exposed to the batch were identified and monitored. The affected machine was removed from service pending full verification.

Technical Analysis What the Machine Didn't Show

Parameter
Dialysate Potassium
What was expected
Expected
2.0 mmol/L
Normal range
Found
14.0 mmol/L
7× higher than expected
Machine Display
Conductivity
What the screen showed
Expected
14.0 mS/cm
Normal range
Found
14.0 mS/cm
"PASS"

The Fatal Flaw: Conductivity Cannot Detect Ion-Specific Errors

Total conductivity remained within range because decreased sodium in the batch offset the increased potassium. The conductivity meter displayed normal values while delivering lethal potassium concentrations.

Na⁺ decreased + K⁺ increased = Total conductivity unchangedMACHINE SAYS "PASS" — PATIENT DIES

Clinical Lessons What We Learned

Lesson 1
🧠 Pattern Recognition

When multiple patients exhibit unexpected symptoms, the common element — machine, room, or concentrate batch — must be suspected immediately.

Lesson 2
📊 Conductivity Limitation

Conductivity monitoring verifies total ionic strength, not individual ion composition. It cannot detect dangerous substitutions of one electrolyte for another.

Lesson 3
🩺 Patient as Sentinel

Acute irritability, cramps, or hypotension during dialysis without clear cause should prompt immediate electrolyte testing and consideration of dialysate composition error.

Lesson 4
🔄 Isolation Protocol

Transferring a symptomatic patient to a proven-stable system is a critical diagnostic and therapeutic step that can confirm equipment-related causation.

Lesson 5
📦 Batch Control

New lots of concentrate should be introduced in a controlled manner, with enhanced monitoring of the first patients treated using that batch.

⚠️ Critical Reminder
Never Trust the Machine Alone

Machines fail. Displays lie. Patients tell the truth. Clinical observation remains the most essential safety layer in hemodialysis.

Conclusion

This event demonstrates that clinical observation remains an essential safety layer in hemodialysis. Equipment alarms and displays cannot replace trained assessment of patient response.

When unexplained adverse events occur, particularly in multiple patients, systematic investigation of water and concentrate must be initiated immediatelyregardless of normal machine readings.

The machine said "PASS." The patient almost died. Trust your eyes, not the screen.

✍️ Author: Ahmed Mohmad Rashyd Musleh Registered Staff Nurse