๐ Clinical Utility: FEUrea < 35% suggests prerenal azotemia, while > 35% suggests ATN.
Advantage: Less affected by diuretics compared to FENa.
Compare with FENa โ
๐ FENa vs FEUrea Comparison
| Feature | FENa | FEUrea |
|---|---|---|
| Formula | (UNa/PNa) / (UCr/PCr) ร 100% | (UUrea/PUrea) / (UCr/PCr) ร 100% |
| Prerenal Cutoff | < 1% | < 35% |
| ATN Cutoff | > 2% | > 35% |
| Effect of Diuretics | Significantly increased (false ATN) | Minimally affected |
| Effect of CKD | May be elevated | May be elevated |
| Sensitivity | ~90% for prerenal | ~90% for prerenal |
| Specificity | ~85% for ATN | ~85% for ATN |
| Best Use | No diuretics, non-CKD | Diuretics, uncertain FENa |
๐ก Clinical Pearl: When FENa is borderline or unreliable due to diuretics,
FEUrea < 35% strongly suggests prerenal azotemia. Consider using both tests together for
improved diagnostic accuracy.
๐ FEUrea Formula:
FEUrea = (Urine Urea / Serum Urea) / (Urine Cr / Serum Cr) ร 100%
Interpretation:
โข < 35%: Prerenal azotemia
โข > 35%: ATN (or other intrinsic renal injury)
Advantages over FENa: Less affected by diuretics, more stable in low urine flow states. Limitations: May be altered by high protein diet, GI bleeding, or steroid use.
FEUrea = (Urine Urea / Serum Urea) / (Urine Cr / Serum Cr) ร 100%
Interpretation:
โข < 35%: Prerenal azotemia
โข > 35%: ATN (or other intrinsic renal injury)
Advantages over FENa: Less affected by diuretics, more stable in low urine flow states. Limitations: May be altered by high protein diet, GI bleeding, or steroid use.