Pulmonary Medicine Reference
PFT Interpretation · Pulmonary Function Tests for Medical Students

📊 Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation A Stepwise Guide for Medical Students · Spirometry, Volumes & DLCO

1. Why PFTs? Indications & Components

  • Evaluate dyspnea, cough, or wheezing of unknown etiology.
  • Diagnose and classify obstructive vs. restrictive lung disease.
  • Assess severity and monitor disease progression (COPD, ILD).
  • Preoperative risk assessment (especially thoracic surgery).
  • Evaluate response to therapy (bronchodilators, antifibrotics).
  • Disability / impairment evaluation.

Components Spirometry (FEV₁, FVC, FEV₁/FVC), Lung Volumes (TLC, RV, FRC), Diffusing Capacity (DLCO), Bronchodilator Response, Flow‑Volume Loops.

2. Spirometry: Core Measurements & Interpretation

Key Definitions

ParameterDefinitionNormal Value
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity)Total volume exhaled forcefully after maximal inspiration≥80% predicted
FEV₁ (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 sec)Volume exhaled in first second of FVC maneuver≥80% predicted
FEV₁/FVC RatioProportion of FVC exhaled in first second≥0.70 (or >LLN)
FEF 25–75%Average flow during middle half of FVC; reflects small airways≥60% predicted
PEF (Peak Expiratory Flow)Maximal expiratory flow; effort‑dependentWide variability

Step 1: Is it Obstructive or Restrictive?

🔴 Obstructive Pattern

  • FEV₁/FVC < 0.70 (or below lower limit of normal, LLN)
  • ↓ FEV₁ (proportional to severity)
  • FVC normal or mildly reduced
  • Examples: COPD, Asthma, Bronchiectasis

🔵 Restrictive Pattern

  • FEV₁/FVC ≥ 0.70 (normal or elevated)
  • ↓ FVC (<80% predicted)
  • ↓ FEV₁ (proportional to FVC)
  • Examples: ILD, Obesity, Neuromuscular disease, Pleural disease
⚠️ Important: Spirometry alone cannot diagnose restriction. Reduced FVC may be due to air trapping (obstructive) or true restriction. Lung volume measurement (TLC) is required to confirm restriction.

Step 2: Severity Classification (Obstructive) — GOLD Criteria for COPD

GOLD StageFEV₁ (% predicted)Severity
GOLD 1≥80%Mild
GOLD 250–79%Moderate
GOLD 330–49%Severe
GOLD 4<30%Very Severe

For Restrictive Disease: Severity based on TLC % predicted (mild 70–80%, moderate 60–69%, severe <60%).

3. Bronchodilator Response (Reversibility Testing)

  • Perform spirometry before and 15–20 minutes after inhaled short‑acting bronchodilator (e.g., albuterol 400 μg).
  • Significant response: ≥12% and ≥200 mL increase in FEV₁ or FVC.
  • Positive response suggests asthma (though not diagnostic; some COPD patients also show reversibility).
  • Absence of acute reversibility does not rule out asthma (may require longer treatment trial).

4. Lung Volumes: Confirming Restriction & Hyperinflation

Measured by body plethysmography (gold standard) or helium dilution / nitrogen washout. Spirometry cannot measure residual volume (RV).

Volume / CapacityDefinitionObstructiveRestrictive
TLC (Total Lung Capacity)Volume at maximal inspiration↑ (hyperinflation)↓ (<80% predicted)
RV (Residual Volume)Volume after maximal exhalation↑↑ (air trapping)↓ or normal
FRC (Functional Residual Capacity)Volume at end of quiet exhalation (RV + ERV)
RV/TLC RatioFraction of TLC that is residual volume↑ (>40%)Normal or ↑
VC (Vital Capacity)TLC − RV↓ or normal
💡 Obstructive: TLC ↑, RV ↑↑, FRC ↑. Restrictive: TLC ↓, RV ↓/N, FRC ↓.

5. Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)

  • Measures gas transfer across alveolar‑capillary membrane using carbon monoxide (CO).
  • Normal DLCO: ≥75% predicted (adjust for hemoglobin and carboxyhemoglobin).
DLCOMechanismClinical Examples
Decreased (↓) ↓ Surface area, ↑ membrane thickness, pulmonary vascular disease Emphysema, IPF, ILD, PAH, Anemia (corrected value normal), Pneumonectomy
Increased (↑) ↑ Pulmonary blood volume, alveolar hemorrhage Obesity, Asthma, Polycythemia, Early CHF, Alveolar hemorrhage (blood in alveoli binds CO), Left‑to‑right shunt
Normal Isolated airway disease without parenchymal destruction Chronic Bronchitis, Asthma (may be normal or ↑), Neuromuscular disease
🔑 High‑Yield Distinction: In a patient with obstructive spirometry and low DLCO → Emphysema. Obstructive with normal/high DLCO → Asthma or Chronic Bronchitis.

6. Flow‑Volume Loops: Visual Patterns

The shape of the expiratory and inspiratory limbs provides critical diagnostic clues.

PatternAppearanceClinical Significance
NormalRapid rise to peak, linear descent
ObstructiveScooped (concave) expiratory limb; may see reduced peak flowCOPD, Asthma (dynamic airway collapse)
RestrictiveTall, narrow loop; reduced volumes but preserved flow relative to volumeILD, Obesity, Chest wall restriction
Fixed Upper Airway ObstructionFlattening of both inspiratory and expiratory limbs (box shape)Tracheal stenosis, Goiter, Tumor
Variable Extrathoracic ObstructionFlattening of inspiratory limb onlyVocal cord paralysis / dysfunction, Retrosternal goiter
Variable Intrathoracic ObstructionFlattening of expiratory limb onlyTracheomalacia, Distal tracheal tumor
💡 Extrathoracic = Inspiratory flattening; Intrathoracic = Expiratory flattening. (Think: Extra = In, Intra = Ex).

7. Classic PFT Patterns by Disease

ConditionFEV₁/FVCFEV₁FVCTLCRVDLCO
Asthma↓ (or normal between exacerbations)↓ or NN or ↑N or ↑N or ↑
Chronic Bronchitis↓ or NNN or ↑N or ↓
Emphysema↓↓↑↑↑↑↓↓
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)N or ↑↓↓↓↓↓ or N↓↓
ObesityNN or ↓NN
Neuromuscular DiseaseN↓↓↑ (weak expiration)N
Pulmonary Hypertension (PAH)N or ↓ (mild)N or ↓N or ↓NN↓ (disproportionate to volumes)
Bronchiectasis↓ (often)↓ or NN or ↑N or ↓

8. Additional PFT Components & Provocation Testing

Methacholine Challenge (Bronchoprovocation)

  • Indicated when asthma is suspected but spirometry is normal.
  • Patient inhales increasing doses of methacholine (muscarinic agonist) → induces bronchoconstriction.
  • Positive test: ≥20% fall in FEV₁ from baseline at or before the maximum dose (PC₂₀).
  • Contraindications: Severe airflow obstruction (FEV₁ <50%), uncontrolled hypertension, recent MI/stroke, pregnancy.

Maximal Voluntary Ventilation (MVV)

  • Patient breathes as hard and fast as possible for 12–15 seconds. Estimates ventilatory reserve.
  • Reduced in neuromuscular disease, poor effort, severe obstruction.
  • Used in preoperative evaluation for lung resection (predicted postoperative FEV₁ and DLCO).

Respiratory Muscle Strength

  • MIP (Maximal Inspiratory Pressure): Measures inspiratory muscle strength (diaphragm). Normal < -60 cm H₂O (more negative is stronger).
  • MEP (Maximal Expiratory Pressure): Measures expiratory muscle strength (abdominals). Normal > +100 cm H₂O.
  • Reduced in neuromuscular disorders (ALS, myasthenia gravis, Guillain‑Barré).

9. Stepwise PFT Interpretation Algorithm

  1. Check Quality: Acceptable and repeatable? (3 acceptable maneuvers, 2 reproducible).
  2. Look at FEV₁/FVC Ratio:
    • <0.70 (or <LLN) → Obstructive pattern. Go to Step 3.
    • ≥0.70 → Normal or Restrictive. Go to Step 4.
  3. If Obstructive:
    • Assess severity by FEV₁ % predicted (GOLD 1–4).
    • Check bronchodilator response (≥12% & 200 mL = significant reversibility).
    • Check TLC: ↑ = hyperinflation; normal = simple obstruction.
    • Check DLCO: ↓ = emphysema or parenchymal destruction; N/↑ = asthma / chronic bronchitis.
  4. If Normal Ratio (FEV₁/FVC ≥0.70):
    • Check FVC: Normal → Normal PFTs (consider methacholine challenge if high suspicion).
    • FVC <80% → Possible restriction. Must measure TLC.
    • TLC <80% → Confirmed Restriction. TLC normal → Non‑restrictive pattern (e.g., poor effort, early obstruction with air trapping).
  5. If Restrictive: Check DLCO. ↓ DLCO → parenchymal disease (ILD). Normal DLCO → extrapulmonary restriction (obesity, neuromuscular, pleural).

10. Clinical Case Applications

Case 1: 65‑year‑old smoker with progressive dyspnea

PFTs: FEV₁ 45%, FVC 70%, FEV₁/FVC 0.50, TLC 130%, RV 180%, DLCO 40%.

  • FEV₁/FVC 0.50 → Obstructive pattern.
  • FEV₁ 45% → GOLD 3 (Severe).
  • TLC ↑, RV ↑↑ → Hyperinflation with air trapping.
  • DLCO ↓↓ → Significant parenchymal destruction.
  • Diagnosis: Severe COPD with predominant emphysema.

Case 2: 50‑year‑old with progressive dyspnea and dry cough

PFTs: FEV₁ 62%, FVC 60%, FEV₁/FVC 0.82, TLC 65%, DLCO 45%.

  • FEV₁/FVC 0.82 (normal) → Not obstructive.
  • FVC 60% → Reduced. TLC 65% → Confirmed restriction.
  • DLCO ↓↓ → Parenchymal process.
  • Diagnosis: Restrictive lung disease with impaired gas exchange. Likely Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). HRCT needed.

Case 3: 40‑year‑old with episodic wheezing, normal spirometry today

PFTs: FEV₁ 92%, FVC 95%, FEV₁/FVC 0.80, TLC 100%, DLCO 105%.

  • Normal spirometry and volumes.
  • Suspicion for asthma → Methacholine challenge test.
  • Positive challenge confirms airway hyperresponsiveness.

Case 4: 30‑year‑old with stridor and dyspnea on exertion

Flow‑Volume Loop: Flattening of both inspiratory and expiratory limbs. FEV₁ 70%, FVC 72%, FEV₁/FVC 0.78.

  • Normal FEV₁/FVC but reduced flows with plateau on both limbs → Fixed upper airway obstruction.
  • Likely tracheal stenosis (e.g., post‑intubation) or goiter. CT neck/chest indicated.

11. Predicted Values & Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)

  • PFT values are compared to predicted values based on age, sex, height, and ethnicity (e.g., NHANES III, GLI).
  • Lower Limit of Normal (LLN): 5th percentile of healthy population. More accurate than fixed ratio (0.70) for diagnosing obstruction in elderly or very young.
  • Fixed Ratio (FEV₁/FVC <0.70): Simple but may overdiagnose COPD in elderly (normal aging reduces ratio) and underdiagnose in young adults.
  • Always interpret PFTs in clinical context; borderline values require clinical correlation.

12. Quick Reference: PFT Patterns Summary

Obstructive

  • FEV₁/FVC ↓
  • TLC N or ↑
  • RV ↑
  • DLCO variable

Restrictive

  • FEV₁/FVC N or ↑
  • TLC ↓
  • RV ↓ or N
  • DLCO variable

Mixed

  • FEV₁/FVC ↓
  • TLC ↓
  • RV variable
  • Examples: Sarcoidosis, combined COPD‑ILD

Nonspecific

  • FEV₁/FVC N
  • TLC N
  • FVC N or mildly ↓
  • Often due to poor effort or early disease

📊 PFT Interpretation Reference · High‑yield for medical students, USMLE, and clinical rotations.
Covers spirometry, lung volumes, DLCO, flow‑volume loops, bronchoprovocation, and disease‑specific patterns.